this article I have drawn from the local press and I am really shocked as is going far. In general, I support it when someone is open and admits that he for the care of his animal has no or too little money. It does not always have the effect that you have to part with his beloved pet. There are ways. The SPCA has Mülheimer it is the task of such an exemplary manner "destitute farmers" to help - at this point also a tribute to various regional veterinary practices who accept this thing as well. - But this case shows how some Mosna are ripped off. Something has the unfortunate consequence that this aid be worst if set, occur because Bert Rueger land. Truly needy can no longer be helped. Just unbelievable!
now the article:
bring fraudsters Mülheimer SPCA donations
Mülheim. Many pet owners can not afford the cost of a vet visit. The Mülheim SPCA offers in such cases financial support. However, fraudsters take advantage of this - and put the donation in his own pockets.
Heidrun Schultchen from Mülheim SPCA notes with concern: "70 percent of the people who call us can or want to bear the cost of the vet not."
an extreme case of irresponsibility, if not fraud trial , the SPCA has seen these days: a woman asked the association for help because their ten-week-old cat had suffered a broken femur Popsie. "Up to two thirds of the costs, our club are in very serious cases," said Heidrun Schultchen. Likewise, it offers once a month on a consultation to recipients of ALG II references. At least one third but the owner must always carry themselves.
But after Schultchen had resolved the financing with a veterinarian, was the owner the next day to have achieved any more. Instead, the club reached a call from the municipal animal shelter: A cat with severe leg fracture was obtained there by a couple made. It was allegedly in Horbachtal, so said the couple's home when the operation is completed (and paid), whether one would take up the "stray animals" but happy. Schultchen was light dependent and is more secure because of the description: "It was the woman who owns the cat. That would in my opinion a scam. "
not an isolated case. Owners are posing as finder to avoid veterinary costs. The SPCA will investigate the matter and therefore the city has already agreed, as the need to know if their Services - the home is run by the government - abuse. It could lead even to a complaint against the owner. Especially as the cause of the injury is unclear. The operation in the animal hospital, meanwhile, is going well, Popsie but four weeks have prescribed bed rest before they are taught
Source: http://www.derwesten.de
0 comments:
Post a Comment